For One Democratic State
in the whole of Palestine (Israel)

FOR FULL EQUALITY OF NATIVE AND ADOPTIVE PALESTINIANS

FOR One Man, One Vote

Home


Search

Wikipedia: Chaos Controlled – follow-up

 

(1) Our London friends began an amusing and active campaign against a Wikipedia agent Smith, called Roland Rance. They produce short videos targeting him. But this man is under protection: these videos are being taken off in a matter of hours, by youtube or google. But our friends keep posting, and you may help their campaign by reposting these funny videos.

Here are few links, alas, they die very fast:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXFCHxLwpoM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jvjxHJEbRw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BOg2Qfsd6E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iefnjc2uhk8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbbWaUa3oKU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYIAeGa3oVM

 

(2) This true historical item was banned from Wikipedia by its overseers:

 

http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/19-05-2008/105255-famine-0

Famine Killed 7 Million People in USA


by Dmitry Lyskov

Translated by Dmitry Sudakov

Another on-line scandal has been gathering pace recently. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, deleted an article by a Russian researcher, who wrote about the USA’s losses in the Great Depression of 1932-1933. Indignant bloggers began to actively distribute the article on the Russian part of a popular blog service known as Livejournal. The above-mentioned article triggered a heated debate.


The researcher touched upon quite a hot topic in the article – the estimation of the number of victims of the Great Depression in the USA.  The material presented in the article apparently made  Wikipedia’s moderators delete the piece from the database  of the online encyclopedia.

The researcher, Boris Borisov, in his article titled “The American Famine” estimated the victims of the financial crisis in the US at over 7 million people. The researcher also directly compared the US events of 1932-1933  with Holodomor, or Famine, in the USSR during 1932-1933.

In the article, Borisov used the official data of the US Census Bureau.   Having revised the number of the US population, birth and date rates, immigration and emigration, the researcher came to conclusion that the United States lost over 7 million people during the famine of 1932-1933.  “According to the US statistics, the US lost not less than 8 million 553 thousand people from 1931 to 1940. Afterwards, population growth indices change twice instantly  exactly between 1930-1931: the indices drop  and stay on the same level for ten years.   There can no explanation to this phenomenon found in the extensive text of the report by the US Department of Commerce “Statistical Abstract of the United States,” the author wrote.

Analyzing the period of the Great Depression in the USA,  the author notes a remarkable similarity with events  taking place in the USSR during the 1930s. He even introduced  a new term for the USA – defarming – an analogue  to dispossession of wealthy farmers in the Soviet Union.

“Few people know about 5 Million American Farmers  (about a Million Families) whom Banks Ousted from them  - Lands because of Debts. The US Govt. did not provide them with land, work, social aid, pension – nothing,” the article says. “Every sixth American farmer was affected by famine.   People were forced to leave their homes  and go to nowhere without any money and any property.   They found themselves in the middle of nowhere enveloped  in massive unemployment, famine and gangsterism.”

The then state of affairs in the US society can be seen in Peter Jackson’s movie King Kong. The movie starts with scenes of the Great Depression and tells the story of an actress  who did not eat for three days and tried to steal an apple  from a street vendor. There is food in the city, but many people had no money to buy it in unemployment-paralyzed New York. People starve in the streets against the background  of stores selling a variety of foodstuffs. “About 6.5 million pigs were killed at that time,”  the researcher wrote. The consequences of those policies were predictable,   the author of the article wrote.   “Here is what a child recollected about those years:

“We changed our usual food for something for available.   We used to eat bush leaves instead of cabbage.   We ate frogs too.   My mother and my older sister died during a year.”  (Jack Griffin).”

So-called public works introduced by President Roosevelt became a salvation for a huge number of jobless and landless Americans. However, the salvation was only a phantom, Boris Borisov wrote.   The works conducted under the aegis of the Public Works Admin. and the Civil Works Administration were about building channels,  roads or bridges in remote, wild and dangerous territories.

Up to 3.3 million people were involved in those works at a time, whereas the total number of people amounted to 8.5 million, not to count prisoners.

“Conditions and death rate at those works  are to be studied separately. A member of public works  would make $30, and pay $25 of taxes from this amount.   So a person could make only  $5 for a month of hard work in malarial swamps.”

The conditions, under which people were working for food,  could be compared to Stalin’s GULAG camp. “The Public Works Administration (PWA)  bore a striking resemblance to GULAG.  The PWA was chaired by “American Beria,”  the Secretary of Interior Affairs, Harold Ickes,  who threw about 2 million people into camps  for the unemployed youth,” Borisov wrote.

“Harold LeClair Ickes (1874–1952) later interned  USA’s ethnic Japanese in concentration camps.   The first stage of the operation took only 72 hours (1941-1942).

“In 1940, the US population was supposed to make up at least 141.856 million people upon the preservation  of previous demographic trends. As a matter of fact, the USA had the 131.409-strong population in 1940, of which only 3.054 million can be explained  with changes in migration dynamics.

Thus, 7.394,000 people simply do not exist as of 1940.   There are no official arguments to explain the phenomenon,” Boris Borisov wrote.

It is worthy of note that modern-day Russian patriotic historians reject methods of research based on the general estimation  of demographic losses. They believe that demographic processes are not linear and depend on a number of factors. Such historians think that victims of communism estimations made on the base of demographic research works by Stephan Kurt and Richard Pipes, which George Bush and Helen Bonner announced at the opening of Victims  of Communism Memorial Foundation in Washington, are false.

On the other hand, these methods are widely used  in contemporary science of history. Ukrainian historian  Stanislav Kulchitsky used the method to calculate  the number of victims of the Ukrainian Holodomor (famine),  which was subsequently officially recognized.

(3) From PalestineRemembered

I'm on a mailing list that carries your articles and I saw the one on Wikipedia.

Have a look at the latest trouble I'm in:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PalestineRemembered#Blocked

Needless to say, there is a mass of other trouble - including a proven
false attack on me as "taking my views and references from the
Holocaust Deniers" by Jayjg (which may have led him to disappear from
August to December last year?).

Best PR

 

(4) From Ken Freeland:

 

Anyone who's spent any time on Wikipedia knows that it is about as  objective about issues relating to Israel and Zionism as is National Public Radio (with correspondent Lynn Gradstein, who was feted by local Zionist groups in Israel) and about as neutral as the United States government in brokering a peace in the so-called Middle East "conflict."  It is simply unbelievable that any website purporting to be pro-Palestinian could possible expect honest readers to accept Wikipedia's goodwill in this regard.   When will this process of Zionist hegemony over all media end?  When will Jewish journalists demand an end to it in the name of journalistic integrity?  The answer my friend, is blowin' in the wind.  And has been for decades.

 

Peace,
Ken Freeland

 

(5) From Henry Kopke

 

Hello Israel Adam,
This comes from Canada:

I like the stories being sent by "that little green man from Mars" and
I appreciate seeing and reading his views on the world we live in. I
approve of his "swedish-russian-jewish-orthodox-anti-semitic or
whatever" interpretation of politics and agree with his views on the
treatment of the Palestinians by Israel. I just wish that there were
more such intelligent and straight thinking people in this world.
Keep up the good work!

 

(6) From Col. Maguire

 

Dear Swedish Neo-Nazi Imposter,

 

Excellent article for the uninformed masses.  I saw the original breathless 'expose' earlier.  Naturally I interpreted it as merely a Zionist Likudnik plot to overturn Wiki's existing Zionist Laborite control.   No more significant than Israeli elections.

 

This event:  "A hundred years ago, a New York lawyer Samuel Untermeyer financed the first Scofield Reference Bible; since then, the Scofield Bibles are being republished in newer even more pro-Jewish editions and they bring in millions of Christian Zionists."

 

deserves more attention and better investigative journalism than it has received to date.  I think Untermeyer himself only played a partial role in this by supporting Scofield during his period of editing, or rather Talmudicizing, the KJV Bible.  When we look at everything, Untermeyer's own role reduces to local NYC Zionist cashier.

 

1.  Scofield's own background.  No known divinity school training to justify his T.h.d.  No known ability in Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek.  Convicted forger and swindler, notorious adulterer, wife abandoner and 'deadbeat dad'.  iow, the perfect shabbas goy profile.

 

2.  Place of authorship:  Scofield went on sabbatical to Switzerland, of all places, to 'complete' his work.  You and I know this as a hotbed of Jewish subversives of all kinds prior to WWI.   Bosheviks, Zionists, Rrothschilds...

 

3.  First publisher.  Oxford University Press, 1909.  And revised in 1917 in the Year of the Balfour Declaration.  This particular transaction is very curious, especially given Scofield's own known notorious personal history.  Nor has the august Oxford University Press felt any need to rescind its imprimatur despite widespread knowledge of Scofield's infamous personal and professional life.

 

I personally rank Scofield's sulpherous book as second only to "The Holocaust" (TM) in its political importance for intellectually and morally justifying Zionism among Christians.

 

Regards,

 

Maguire

 

Home